lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: problem with date searching.
Date Fri, 04 May 2012 15:14:47 GMT
Right, you need to do the explicit qualification of the date field.
dismax parsing is intended to work with text-type fields, not
numeric or date fields. If you attach &debugQuery=on, you'll
see that your "scanneddate" field is just dropped.

Furthermore, dismax was never intended to work with range
queries. Note this from the DisMaxQParserPlugin page:

" extremely simplified subset of the Lucene QueryParser syntax"

I'll expand on this a bit on the Wiki page.


Best
Erick

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Dmitry Kan <dmitry.kan@gmail.com> wrote:
> unless, something else is wrong, my question would be, if you have the
> documents in solr stamped with these dates?
> also could try for a test specifying the field name directly:
>
> q=scanneddate:["2011-09-22T22:40:30Z" TO "2012-02-02T01:30:52Z"]
>
> also, in your first e-mail you said you have used
>
> [*"2012-02-02T01:30:52Z" TO "2012-02-02T01:30:52Z"*]
>
> with asterisks *, what scanneddate values did you then get?
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:37 PM, ayyappan <ayyabas05@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> thanks for quick response.
>>
>>  I tried your advice .  ["2011-09-22T22:40:30Z" TO "2012-02-02T01:30:52Z"]
>> like that even though i am not getting any result .
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/problem-with-date-searching-tp3961761p3961833.html
>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Dmitry Kan

Mime
View raw message