lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alireza Salimi <alireza.sal...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lucene vs Solr design decision
Date Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:13:54 GMT
This solution makes sense, but I still don't know if I can use solrCloud
with
this configuration or not.

On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Robert Stewart <bstewart.ny@gmail.com>wrote:

> Split up index into say 100 cores, and then route each search to a
> specific core by some mod operator on the user id:
>
> core_number = userid % num_cores
>
> core_name = "core"+core_number
>
> That way each index core is relatively small (maybe 100 million docs or
> less).
>
>
> On Mar 9, 2012, at 2:02 PM, Glen Newton wrote:
>
> > millions of cores will not work...
> > ...yet.
> >
> > -glen
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Lan <dung.lan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Solr has no limitation on the number of cores. It's limited by your
> hardware,
> >> inodes and how many files you could keep open.
> >>
> >> I think even if you went the Lucene route you would run into same
> hardware
> >> limits.
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Lucene-vs-Solr-design-decision-tp3813457p3813511.html
> >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -
> > http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/
> > -
>
>


-- 
Alireza Salimi
Java EE Developer

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message