Ok, thanks, Erick, good to know. Sorry for the confusion.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatcher@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, don't do that. That's definitely not good advice. If the analysis
> chain is the same for both index and query, just use <analyzer>.
>
> As for Marian's issue... was there literally a + in the query or was that
> urlencoded? Try debugQuery=true for both queries and see what you get for
> the query parsing output.
>
> Erik
>
> On Feb 3, 2012, at 14:18 , Dmitry Kan wrote:
>
> > Actually, I wouldn't count on it and just specify index and query sides
> > explicitly. Just to play it safe.
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Marian Steinbach <marian@sendung.de>
> wrote:
> >
> >> 2012/2/3 Dmitry Kan <dmitry.kan@gmail.com>:
> >>> What about <query> side of the field?
> >>>
> >>
> >> It's identical. At least that's what I think, since I din't specify
> >> the type="query" or type="index" attribute for the analyzer part.
> >>
> >> Marian
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Dmitry Kan
>
>
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
|