lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: triedate vs date
Date Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:11:06 GMT
I'd just try it and see, changing this should be pretty
simple to do a before/after with your data and see
if it's acceptable in your situation...

Best
Erick

On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Jamie Johnson <jej2003@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was recently walking through schema.xml and noticed triedate vs date
> and a note that triedate should be considered instead.  I believe I
> understand the basic principle behind triedate but is there an
> analysis that exists which shows how much bigger an index would be if
> triedate were used vs date?  Also how much faster triedate vs date is?
>  Lastly, the default precisionStep is 6, has there been any analysis
> about speed/size tradeoffs to show how much faster it is with lower
> precisionsSteps (i.e. 2 or 4)?
>
> The only writeups I've seen are the ApacheCon PPT that Uwe Schindler
> put together and this
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/05/13/exploring-lucene-and-solrs-trierange-capabilities/.
>  If there are any other resources available I'd greatly appreciate
> being pointed to them.

Mime
View raw message