Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA26B9363 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 02:59:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8253 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2012 02:59:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 8082 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2012 02:59:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 7574 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2012 02:58:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 02:58:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jason.rutherglen@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 02:58:52 +0000 Received: by pbaa12 with SMTP id a12so10999732pba.35 for ; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:58:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=6GVNcL5qbV4Dv1LA8vKj8M8TGRuKcRHlazXTSgbboWk=; b=YKUMOHhhWhp/+XqsSriLg1SfpwmhHbRG/IChT51xwnvTnl4hqRvydjtNNxlPKzFCzi 0OExMeLBEBw+GoknS5xaD5TORIGS4W3Q5zPmY5ZghKyDn/GWjkHCxkwrG75PNJZNbSxG o3gM1dpRi9Z9Xwfn0I+IQcLKjf5tEaXCFfCCc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.73.101 with SMTP id k5mr126310966pbv.122.1325559510316; Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:58:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.36.36 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 18:58:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1325516490324-3626765.post@n3.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 21:58:30 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: soft commit From: Jason Rutherglen To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org, yonik@lucidimagination.com Cc: markrmiller@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > It still normally makes sense to have the caches enabled (esp filter and document caches). In the NRT case that statement is completely incorrect On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Mark Miller wrote: >> Right - in most NRT cases (very frequent soft commits), the cache should >> probably be disabled. > > Did you mean autowarm should be disabled (as it already is in the > example config)? > It still normally makes sense to have the caches enabled (esp filter > and document caches). > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com