lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ranveer Kumar <ranveer.s...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Solr Cores
Date Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:37:17 GMT
How much query per second a single core can handle in this case..

regards

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Sujatha Arun <suja.arun@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Erick.
>
> Regards
> Sujatha
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > You can have a large number of cores, so people have multiple
> > hundreds. Having multiple cores is preferred over having
> > multiple JVMs since it's more efficient at sharing system
> > resources. If you're running a 32 bit JVM, you are limited in
> > the amount of memory you can let the JVM use, so that's a
> > consideration, but otherwise use multiple cores in one JVM
> > and give that JVM say, half of the physical memory on the
> > machine and tune from there.
> >
> > Best
> > Erick
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Sujatha Arun <suja.arun@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > We have in production a number of individual solr Instnaces on a single
> > > JVM.As a result ,we see that the permgenSpace keeps increasing with
> each
> > > additional instance added.
> > >
> > > I would Like to know ,if we can have solr cores , instead of individual
> > > instances.
> > >
> > >
> > >   - Is there any limit to the number of cores ,for a single instance?
> > >   - Will this decrease the permgen space as the LIB is shared.?
> > >   - Would there be any decrease in performance with number of cores
> > added?
> > >   - Any thing else that I should know before moving into cores?
> > >
> > >
> > > Any help would be appreciated?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Sujatha
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message