Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D31478AB for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76321 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2011 16:33:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 76266 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2011 16:33:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 76258 invoked by uid 99); 23 Dec 2011 16:33:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:33:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.138.229.134] (HELO nm37-vm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (98.138.229.134) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:33:21 +0000 Received: from [98.138.90.57] by nm37.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Dec 2011 16:33:00 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.165] by tm10.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Dec 2011 16:33:00 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1066.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Dec 2011 16:33:00 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 425322.57808.bm@omp1066.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 33342 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Dec 2011 16:33:00 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1324657980; bh=cYu7rEkkRgfnDzJ7EhVJUMi9cYRnSWeX97k9zT3X9W0=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JI+AdecOLbcnx17eQKM7WfyQJNLHG+wSMbcOOPADGdTUlNTXulxwXgKbMNp+ivBbdF6t5t1BKi/XdaEoCi3a63MP+iKvTx8kQitWONvqp4Rl4F+ypQf+lONeeTL05xCDVo1Ssb8NpXCXeCUQTBY8HMlJ6vq6VRFGrfLw/bMTSrE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1UmV+UhZ7Pfciu4plE82GDcUtdp2Pi31dU/Nf6/Pip0/8iQJP+uHfOcdwW0kTTop/t1Z+jbMpVW0aYCloE0+3TARHFhnzVaLfk7n9Vs8fiXtVxUnyLk56+LOqilT5HV1TtIWKlradHWU0x+zyZfWbW/PDzH+qAb9XvFW2rzJ04I=; X-YMail-OSG: nBYBQcYVM1mXKj0o5IdA1tvjcJF3hYBLMsvgDmn595gJ_IE xT_PdFj_6reMMx.gudz915O_XBqgdalT9wCmzKLD0.nbtoNV4b6ckHvjBvwd AHDICA.Qg1Rq_c4uE0_I3hvfyxbHTp2a_yVZ3zEC7ygKdyOJVOQ.ogNfJS7F eeSG3sgiWqISHaxU8RRphluv8ed9.gwL_gPdYCZs9jp4G2at_kmPnICWeEUN G7LAfm4pfjbrczVYrOmPn4YIYIAlcyVTv7NltP7pJxAIM23yiQk0uYl5YIin nafDEQeF4yNgrqotRW0ej.mt1k._QzkPD1lLEHwj7TI86PBWyrYFjjTKDAmS ldzidCznycVYFD_ebU0TIBm30h3db9Y7DIrnheI6yzlsNIJkkdQT7dJFvLQz v_T9diA3ZTM94ISxDBDNxpVLFhgVzIVhx5SOOjYqHNG3HVHl8wU1mA2OBI4P NqFc- Received: from [78.160.223.22] by web121701.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 08:33:00 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/15.0.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.115.331698 Message-ID: <1324657980.33137.YahooMailClassic@web121701.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 08:33:00 -0800 (PST) From: Ahmet Arslan Subject: Re: about partial index update To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > if in this case, then i think reindex the whole document > probably will be > easily right ? as compare to write to text file (look like > more work and > probably performance same ? ) I don't think dumping id,vote pairs to a text file is more work than indexing whole document that has more than 20 fields.