lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Core overhead
Date Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:00:02 GMT
We still disagree.

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Jason Rutherglen <
jason.rutherglen@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ted,
>
> The list would be unreadable if everyone spammed at the bottom their
> email like Otis'.  It's just bad form.
>
> Jason
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Sounds like we disagree.
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Jason Rutherglen <
> > jason.rutherglen@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Ted,
> >>
> >> "...- FREE!" is stupid idiot spam.  It's annoying and not suitable.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > I thought it was slightly clumsy, but it was informative.  It seemed
> >> like a
> >> > fine thing to say.  Effectively it was "I/we have developed a tool
> that
> >> > will help you solve your problem".  That is responsive to the OP and
> it
> >> is
> >> > clear that it is a commercial deal.
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Jason Rutherglen <
> >> > jason.rutherglen@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Wow the shameless plugging of product (footer) has hit a new low
> Otis.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Otis Gospodnetic
> >> >> <otis_gospodnetic@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi Yury,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Not sure if this was already covered in this thread, but with
N
> >> smaller
> >> >> cores on a single N-CPU-core box you could run N queries in parallel
> >> over
> >> >> smaller indices, which may be faster than a single query going
> against a
> >> >> single big index, depending on how many concurrent query requests the
> >> box
> >> >> is handling (i.e. how busy or idle the CPU cores are).
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Otis
> >> >> > ----
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Performance Monitoring SaaS for Solr -
> >> >> http://sematext.com/spm/solr-performance-monitoring/index.html
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>________________________________
> >> >> >> From: Yury Kats <yurykats@yahoo.com>
> >> >> >>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> >> >> >>Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 12:58 PM
> >> >> >>Subject: Core overhead
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>Does anybody have an idea, or better yet, measured data,
> >> >> >>to see what the overhead of a core is, both in memory and speed?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>For example, what would be the difference between having 1
core
> >> >> >>with 100M documents versus having 10 cores with 10M documents?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message