lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gora Mohanty <>
Subject Re: ISO8601 Date format
Date Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:39:53 GMT
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Gerke, Axel
<> wrote:
> Hello,
> due a different Bug in another system, we stored a date in a datefield
> with an value like "999-12-31T23:00:00Z". As you can see in the schema
> browser below, solr stores it correct with four digits but in a response
> the leading zero is missing.
> My question is: is a three digit year a valid ISO-8601 date format for
> the response or is this a bug? Because other languages (f.e. python) are
> throwing an exception with a three digit year?! , and
seem to indicate that a four-digit year with leading zeroes is required. To
quote from the "General principles" section in the latter reference:
"Each date and
time value has a fixed number of digits that must be padded with leading zeros".


View raw message