Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 662E290B9 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 23:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82851 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2011 23:35:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 82718 invoked by uid 500); 23 Oct 2011 23:35:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 82710 invoked by uid 99); 23 Oct 2011 23:35:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 23:35:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of zimzaz.wfz@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.48] (HELO mail-yw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 23:35:06 +0000 Received: by ywm14 with SMTP id 14so2797982ywm.35 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 16:34:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=UKbucWkeTVPM1ETdFXerfIF8ghcXAwzplPCN5LS93vM=; b=nVHs2zfrXBSEQsz8WIEyWVIWnxHfp3vHVziEsHzNPqtDkIO2xV8+1yxCkfWB3HeHDL /JEnuJ8PdVlh91htI8cRrWDyxPC+CFzmGXnbfLVT9+r/3A+0O9MydhJIeDGLtJUkgKtT 3m70J91ZiWUxuHOhqlIJWa4U85EXT/9eUlHG4= Received: by 10.182.31.15 with SMTP id w15mr13777obh.7.1319412885388; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 16:34:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.16.226 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 16:34:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Fred Zimmerman Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 18:34:25 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: schema.xml bloat? To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9398f5d587e3204afffc071 --14dae9398f5d587e3204afffc071 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, it seems from my limited experience thus far that as new data types are added, schema.xml will tend to become bloated with many different field and fieldtype definitions. Is this a problem in real life, and if so, what strategies are used to address it? FredZ --14dae9398f5d587e3204afffc071--