Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of static.void.dev@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.218.48 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=MxKLQtgjyT1Ye+g+rAj4MMF6/ImqFx3JciyLNW8IxVVngfmvBJlJuMqWn4nKumiyTN
         Q/YnkpUG2EMLExeTNvEVfWMdx8H6qoArb7z0Q/lOPytpBIh/XZxhm8upchUjNEsGhXc5
         tRoGhWMW0iBa+/QNPL/JNFYTfj8MBoLOuy55Y=
Message-ID: <4DE66797.1090103@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 09:23:51 -0700
From: Mark <static.void.dev@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: K-Stemmer for Solr 3.1
References: <4DCB244B.90607@gmail.com>
 <11565_1305180847_ZZh0q2H8U7FZC.00_4DCB7AAF.50104@uni-bielefeld.de>
 <4DCBEF7E.4020803@gmail.com>
 <29918_1305268092_ZZh0q7N5d_tC4.00_4DCCCF7B.7060409@uni-bielefeld.de>
 <4DE03444.3080709@gmail.com>
 <2D127F11DC79714E9B6A43AC9458147FBAD431AE@suex07-mbx-03.ad.syr.edu>
In-Reply-To: 
 <2D127F11DC79714E9B6A43AC9458147FBAD431AE@suex07-mbx-03.ad.syr.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thanks. Ill have to create a Jira account to vote i guess.

We are already using KStemmer in 1.4.2 production and I would like to 
upgrade to 3.1. In the meantime, what is another stemmer I could use out 
of the box that would be have similar to KStemmer?

Thanks

On 5/28/11 10:02 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Yonik Seeley indicated on LUCENE-152 that he is considering contributing Lucid's KStemmer version to Lucene:
>
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-152?focusedCommentId=13035647&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13035647>
>
> You can vote on the issue to communicate your interest.
>
> Steve
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mark [mailto:static.void.dev@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 7:31 PM
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: K-Stemmer for Solr 3.1
>>
>> Where can one find the KStemmer source for 4.0?
>>
>> On 5/12/11 11:28 PM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
>>> I backported a Lucid KStemmer version from solr 4.0 which I found
>>> somewhere.
>>> Just changed from
>>> import org.apache.lucene.analysis.util.CharArraySet;  // solr4.0
>>> to
>>> import org.apache.lucene.analysis.CharArraySet;  // solr3.1
>>>
>>> Bernd
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 12.05.2011 16:32, schrieb Mark:
>>>> java.lang.AbstractMethodError:
>>>> org.apache.lucene.analysis.TokenStream.incrementToken()Z
>>>>
>>>> Would you mind explaining your modifications? Thanks
>>>>
>>>> On 5/11/11 11:14 PM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
>>>>> Am 12.05.2011 02:05, schrieb Mark:
>>>>>> It appears that the older version of the Lucid Works KStemmer is
>>>>>> incompatible with Solr 3.1. Has anyone been able to get this to
>>>>>> work? If not,
>>>>>> what are you using as an alternative?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Lucid KStemmer works nice with Solr3.1 after some minor mods to
>>>>> KStemFilter.java and KStemFilterFactory.java.
>>>>> What problems do you have?
>>>>>
>>>>> Bernd