lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Otis Gospodnetic <otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Solr Performance
Date Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:39:53 GMT
Rohit:

Yes, run indexing on one machine (master), searches on the other (slave) and set 
up replication between them.  Don't optimize your index and warm up the searcher 
and caches on slaves.  No downtime.

Otis
----
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/



----- Original Message ----
> From: Rohit <rohit@in-rev.com>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Fri, June 3, 2011 11:49:28 AM
> Subject: Solr Performance
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> We migrated to Solr a few days back, but have now after  going live we have
> noticed a performance drop, especially when we do a delta  index, which we
> are executing every 1hours with around 100,000 records . We  have a multi
> core Solr server running on a Linux machine, with 4Gb given to  the JVM, its
> not possible for me to upgrade the ram or give more memory to  the Solr
> currently.
> 
> 
> 
> So I was considering the option of  running a master-slave config, I have
> another window machine with 4gb ram  available on the same network. I have
> two questions regarding this,
> 
> 
> 
> .         Is this a right path to take  ?
> 
> .         How can I do this with minimum down time,  given the fact that our
> index is huge
> 
> .          Can someone point me to the right direction for this?
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks and  Regards,
> 
> Rohit
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message