lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Satish Kumar <satish.kumar.just.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Baseline vs. Incremental Indexing
Date Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:44:14 GMT
thanks Markus and Otis!

This link was helpful:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors#Optimization_Considerations

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Markus Jelsma
<markus.jelsma@openindex.io>wrote:

> The only thing you'd periodically do is optimizing the existing index.
>
> > Hi Satish,
> >
> > I can't think of any benefits you'd reap by complete/full reindexing into
> a
> > new index.  Incremental indexing will be faster.
> >
> >
> > Otis
> > ----
> > Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
> > Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >
> > > From: Satish Kumar <satish.kumar.just.doit@gmail.com>
> > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > > Sent: Fri, April 29, 2011 2:58:25 PM
> > > Subject: Baseline vs. Incremental Indexing
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Currently we index new/updated records every 30 minutes (I am
>  referring
> > > to this as incremental/partial index) -- i.e., records will be  added
> to
> > > an existing index. Are there any benefits in creating a new index
> > > (i.e., delete the existing index and create it) from a performance
> point
> > > of  view everyday or a week?
> > >
> > > In other search system I worked with,  incremental updates are
> generated
> > > in a small file. When the server is  restarted, each update in the
> small
> > > files need to be applied. When there are  several small files to be
> > > applied, the restart process could take a few  minutes to complete so
> > > the recommendation was to run baseline process every  night. I'm
> > > wondering if this is the case with Solr as  well?
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Satish
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message