lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Markus Jelsma <markus.jel...@openindex.io>
Subject Re: Baseline vs. Incremental Indexing
Date Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:12:04 GMT
The only thing you'd periodically do is optimizing the existing index.

> Hi Satish,
> 
> I can't think of any benefits you'd reap by complete/full reindexing into a
> new index.  Incremental indexing will be faster.
> 
> 
> Otis
> ----
> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
> Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> 
> > From: Satish Kumar <satish.kumar.just.doit@gmail.com>
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Fri, April 29, 2011 2:58:25 PM
> > Subject: Baseline vs. Incremental Indexing
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Currently we index new/updated records every 30 minutes (I am  referring
> > to this as incremental/partial index) -- i.e., records will be  added to
> > an existing index. Are there any benefits in creating a new index 
> > (i.e., delete the existing index and create it) from a performance point
> > of  view everyday or a week?
> > 
> > In other search system I worked with,  incremental updates are generated
> > in a small file. When the server is  restarted, each update in the small
> > files need to be applied. When there are  several small files to be
> > applied, the restart process could take a few  minutes to complete so
> > the recommendation was to run baseline process every  night. I'm
> > wondering if this is the case with Solr as  well?
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Satish

Mime
View raw message