Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of goksron@gmail.com designates
 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=GjBw23YSobQGQNIRNN196TiO39EHwoMjGREL8N4UCb97VeyQQ6s7wCjqBl3C1rafIE
         cg20OREuk5DWoMV7kR5RXrtZAyw9Rkq5Fs7c6YG7ZbTUV/UsLME4xLcGN0vfxGF9Kte+
         JaPu7NRTv0JSpUhs95U3WM97by/ksBA2fDp4Y=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B73342E2-743A-4AD0-8F2B-EF231DC985E2@535consulting.com>
References: <B73342E2-743A-4AD0-8F2B-EF231DC985E2@535consulting.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 17:07:18 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTimJKZc0YDSQJEqZ+siy39NkbM5ZLYCXzT4NK657@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Which version of Solr?
From: Lance Norskog <goksron@gmail.com>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

There is momentum towards doing a release of 3.x. I would be
comfortable using the 3.x branch.

--- But I'm unable to get SolrJ to work due to the 'javabin' version
mismatch. I'm using the 1.4.1 version of SolrJ, but I always get an
HTTP response code of 200, but the return entity is simply a null
byte, which does not match the version number of 1 defined in Solr
common.  ---

I've never seen this problem. At this point you are better off
starting with 3.x instead of chasing this problem down.

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Jeff Schmidt <jas@535consulting.com> wrote=
:
> Hello:
>
> I'm working on incorporating Solr into a SaaS based life sciences semanti=
c search project. This will be released in about six months. I'm trying to =
determine which version of Solr makes the most sense. When going to the Sol=
r download page, there are 1.3.0, 1.4.0, and 1.4.1. I've been using 1.4.1 w=
hile going through some examples in my Packt book ("Solr 1.4 Enterprise Sea=
rch Server").
>
> But, I also see that Solr 3.1 and 4.0 are in the works. =C2=A0According t=
o:
>
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/#selecte=
dTab=3Dcom.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aroadmap-panel
>
> there is a high degree of progress on both of those releases; including a=
 slew of bug fixes, new features, performance enhancements etc. Should I be=
 making use of one of the newer versions? =C2=A0The hierarchical faceting s=
eems like it could be quite useful. =C2=A0Are there any guesses on when eit=
her 3.1 or 4.0 will be officially released?
>
> So far, 1.4.1 has been good. But I'm unable to get SolrJ to work due to t=
he 'javabin' version mismatch. I'm using the 1.4.1 version of SolrJ, but I =
always get an HTTP response code of 200, but the return entity is simply a =
null byte, which does not match the version number of 1 defined in Solr com=
mon. =C2=A0Anyway, I can follow up on that issue if 1.4.1 is still the most=
 appropriate version to use these days. Otherwise, I'll try again with what=
ever version you suggest.
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> Jeff
> --
> Jeff Schmidt
> 535 Consulting
> jas@535consulting.com
> (650) 423-1068
>
>
>
>
>
>


--=20
Lance Norskog
goksron@gmail.com