lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steven Noels <stev...@outerthought.org>
Subject Re: Solr for noSQL
Date Tue, 01 Feb 2011 12:34:48 GMT
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk> wrote:


>
> Apologies if my "nothing funky" sounded like you weren't doing cool
> stuff.


No offense whatsoever. I think my longer reply paints a more accurate light
on what Lily means in terms of "SOLR for NoSQL", and it was your reaction
who triggered this additional explanation.


> I was merely attempting to say that I very much doubt you were
> doing anything funky like putting HBase underneath Solr as a replacement
> of FSDirectory.


There are some initiatives in the context of Cassandra IIRC, as well as a
project which stores Lucene index files in HBase tables, but frankly they
seem more experimentation, and also I think the nature of how Lucene/SOLR
works + what HBase does on top of Hadoop FS somehow is in conflict with each
other. Too many layers of indirection will kill performance on every layer.



> I was trying to imply that, likely your integration with
> Solr was relatively conventional (interacting with its REST interface),
>


Yep. We figured that was the wiser road to walk, and leaves a clear-defined
interface and possible area of improvement against a too-low level of
integration.


> and the "funky" stuff that you are doing sits outside of that space.
>
> Hope that's a clearer (and more accurate?) attempt at what I was trying
> to say.
>
> Upayavira (who finds the Lily project interesting, and would love to
> find the time to play with it)
>

Anytime, Upayavira. Anytime! ;-)

Steven.
-- 
Steven Noels
http://outerthought.org/
Scalable Smart Data
Makers of Kauri, Daisy CMS and Lily

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message