Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38236 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2010 16:31:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Nov 2010 16:31:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 50788 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 16:31:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 50684 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 16:31:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 50674 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2010 16:31:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:31:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of matheis.stefan@googlemail.com designates 209.85.161.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.48] (HELO mail-fx0-f48.google.com) (209.85.161.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:31:23 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so3616755fxm.35 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:31:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=HdZsL4pTxOVQa3hXwiE8NRE1H6p1yJavzgWWE5rbaIU=; b=br3VuPg+zxJzQmuZRwizsr+k2m5hgedrc3GGWXOfJu/oBqVO0oKpE/KrYybBop9aVE bZwk8+egyW8274OaB03CjbZ8tHmqlB5lPbNltRVDoM6gSCU4uZQxq9xQYvDND9gceUaN 4P1bqsTE3y8YzlqO8qnqpDVCuPYUu00GSnYOU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Tca/E0KhL+EuPR6vnZnLyCm8mJ+pjyHiYzWCmDXwjNHRvpTS3eFJVNCr3rhBxbH0zr D0nI+WA6ldrEwPAR4oTf5Z0hlTNhRu7onewZkrV2z2sJzZX2nGapHYULj9q+GbvSQuDd EtJkZOf4zzeUKsk4q77rfc1pZR1uPyBHk9e+A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.101.135 with SMTP id c7mr5619931fao.39.1291048261890; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:31:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.102.133 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:31:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:31:01 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Boost on newer documents From: Stefan Matheis To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3054ac8b09b3040496339977 --20cf3054ac8b09b3040496339977 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Jason, maybe, just use another field w/ creation-/modification-date and boost on this field? Regards Stefan On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Jason Brown wrote: > > Hi, > > I use the dismax query to search across several fields. > > I find I have a lot of documents with the same document name (one of the > fields that the dismax queries) so I wanted to adjust the relevance so that > titles with a newer published date have a higher relevance than documents > with the same title but are older. Does anyone know how I can achieve this? > > Thank You > > Jason. > > If you wish to view the St. James's Place email disclaimer, please use the > link below > > http://www.sjp.co.uk/portal/internet/SJPemaildisclaimer > --20cf3054ac8b09b3040496339977--