lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dennis Gearon <gear...@sbcglobal.net>
Subject Re: SOLR and secure content
Date Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:53:30 GMT
Solr basically does ONE thing (and related things) very well. Doing all the 
error messaging that yuou want would be fighting all the specialization builit 
into Solr/Lucene code.

 Dennis Gearon


Signature Warning
----------------
It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a better 
idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make them yourself. 
from 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036'


EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.



----- Original Message ----
From: Jos Janssen <jos@websdesign.nl>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tue, November 23, 2010 6:45:12 AM
Subject: Re: SOLR and secure content



The setup of multiple cores is a good option, thanks for the advice.

I agree the "required" field should be in the application layer, but i also
think some "error" handling should come from the Solr server to prevent
incorrect usage. If i only knew how to do this for each request.

Regards,

Jos
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-and-secure-content-tp1945028p1953726.html

Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message