Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 96091 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2010 21:14:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 14 Sep 2010 21:14:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 58474 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2010 21:14:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 58423 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2010 21:14:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 58414 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2010 21:14:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:14:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [155.52.47.64] (HELO pascal.dfci.harvard.edu) (155.52.47.64) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:14:38 +0000 Received: from [155.52.120.63] (oconnor.dfci.harvard.edu [155.52.120.63]) by pascal.dfci.harvard.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DC04CDCA; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:14:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C8FE5A5.4080601@jimmy.harvard.edu> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:14:13 -0400 From: Niall O'Connor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100822 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Cc: Yonik Seeley Subject: Re: Facet Field Value truncation References: <4C8FCE97.7080609@jimmy.harvard.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I opened a bug for this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2120 On 09/14/2010 03:51 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Niall O'Connor > wrote: >> Has anyone come across a situation where they have seen their facet field >> values wrap into a new facet entry when the value exceeds 256 characters? > Yes, for indexed string fields, there currently is a limit of 256 > chars per token. It's been there forever, but I don't think anyone > has hit it before. > > Go ahead and open an issue. > > -Yonik > http://lucenerevolution.org Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8 >