Return-Path: 
 <solr-user-return-40497-apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 68643 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2010 16:22:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Sep 2010 16:22:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 85219 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2010 16:22:43 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 85177 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2010 16:22:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:solr-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
List-Id: <solr-user.lucene.apache.org>
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 85169 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2010 16:22:42 -0000
Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:22:42 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [67.23.2.84] (HELO mail.staffing-systems.co.uk) (67.23.2.84)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:22:18 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.198] (80-42-243-226.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com
 [80.42.243.226])
	by mail.staffing-systems.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21AD6111060
	for <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>; Thu,  2 Sep 2010 16:21:56 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4C7FCF23.5080806@staffing-systems.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:21:55 +0100
From: Luke Tebbs <luke@staffing-systems.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100328)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Localsolr with Dismax
References: <4C7F8767.4050601@staffing-systems.co.uk>
 <4C7FBACB.9030608@adicio.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C7FBACB.9030608@adicio.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Thanks Dan,
That seems to have moved things forwards, however if I do this I get two 
<result> sets, presumably one from localsolr and one from dismax.

e.g -
<response>
<responseHeader>
<status>0</status>
<QTime>116</QTime>
</responseHeader>
<result name="response" numFound="358" start="0">
...
</result>
<result name="response" numFound="8207" start="0">
...
</result>
</response>

Also it seems to explode with a NullPointerException if I dare to try 
and sort by distance - 

INFO: [testCore] webapp=/solr path=/select 
params={sort=geo_distance+asc&q=some+phrase&radius=30&long=-0.1262362&qt=geo&wt=javabin&lat=51.5001524&rows=0&version=1} 
status=500 QTime=123
02-Sep-2010 16:44:50 org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: java.lang.NullPointerException
    at 
org.apache.lucene.spatial.tier.DistanceFieldComparatorSource$DistanceScoreDocLookupComparator.copy(DistanceFieldComparatorSource.java:105)
    at 
org.apache.lucene.search.TopFieldCollector$OneComparatorNonScoringCollector.collect(TopFieldCollector.java:84)
    at 
org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanScorer2.score(BooleanScorer2.java:292)
    ....

I don't know if these are related - perhaps it's trying to compare 
against the dismax records that don't have a geo_distance?
Did you get anything like this?

Luke

dan whelan wrote:
>  I experienced the same issue. The localsolr site says to configure 
> like this:
>
> <arr name="components">
> <str>localsolr</str>
> <str>facet</str>
> <str>mlt</str>
> <str>highlight</str>
> <str>debug</str>
> </arr>
>
> but the default solr components are (note the above config is missing 
> query):
>
> query
> facet
> mlt
> highlight
> stats
> debug
>
> I fixed it by doing this instead
>
> <arr name="first-components">
> <str>localsolr</str>
> </arr>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 9/2/10 4:15 AM, Luke Tebbs wrote:
>> Anyone?
>>
>> I'm really lost as to what to do here... if anyone has any experience 
>> with this
>> or even ideas of things to try I'd really appreciate your input.
>>
>> It seems like what I'm trying to do should work but for some reason 
>> 'defType' seems to be
>> ignored....
>>
>> Thankyou
>>
>> Luke
>>
>> -------- Original Message -------
>>
>> Does anyone have any experience with getting dismax to work with a 
>> geospatial (localsolr) search?
>>
>> I have the following configuration -
>>
>> ....
>> <requestHandler name="standard" class="solr.SearchHandler" 
>> default="true">
>> <lst name="defaults">
>> <str name="defType">dismax</str>
>> <str name="qf">title description^0.5</str>
>> <str name="pf">title description^0.5</str>
>> <str name="mm">0%</str>
>> <str name="tie">0.1</str>
>> </lst>
>> </requestHandler>
>>
>> <requestHandler name="geo" class="solr.SearchHandler">
>> <lst name="defaults">
>> <str name="defType">dismax</str>
>> <str name="qf">title description^0.5</str>
>> <str name="pf">title description^0.5</str>
>> <str name="mm">0%</str>
>> <str name="tie">0.1</str>
>> </lst>
>> <arr name="components">
>> <str>localsolr</str> <str>facet</str>
>> <str>mlt</str>
>> <str>highlight</str>
>> <str>debug</str>
>> </arr>
>> </requestHandler>
>> ....
>>
>> All of the location searching works fine, as does the normal search, 
>> but when using the "geo" handler the textual search seems to be using 
>> the standard search handler and only the title field is searched.
>>
>> I'm a bit stumped on this one, any help would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Luke
>>
>