lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Markus Jelsma <markus.jel...@buyways.nl>
Subject Re: svn branch issues
Date Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:10:12 GMT
Well, it's under heavy development but the 3.x branch is more likely to become 
released than 1.5.x, which is highly unlikely to be ever released.


On Thursday 09 September 2010 13:04:38 Mark Allan wrote:
> Thanks. Are you suggesting I use branch_3x and is that considered
> stable?
> Cheers
> Mark
> 
> On 9 Sep 2010, at 10:47 am, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> >  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/
> >
> > -----Original message-----
> > From: Mark Allan <mark.allan@ed.ac.uk>
> > Sent: Thu 09-09-2010 10:44
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org;
> > Subject: svn branch issues
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As I've mentioned in the past, I've created some custom field types
> > which make use of the AbstractSubTypeFieldType class in the current
> > trunk version of solr for a service we're working on.  We're getting
> > close to putting our service into production (early 2011) and we're
> > now looking for a stable version of Solr to use with these classes.
> > Unfortunately, my field types don't compile against the current stable
> > version (Solr 1.4) because of the missing AbstractSubTypeFieldType and
> > other required classes.
> >
> > Having had a look at JIRA to see the number of outstanding unresolved
> > issues, I tried downloading the now defunct 1.5 branch on the
> > assumption that it's more stable than the current trunk.  Whether or
> > not that's a safe assumption remains to be seen!
> >
> > Anyway, the problem is when I try to checkout the 1.5 branch, I get an
> > error from subversion:
> >
> > $ svn co http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.5-dev
> > svn: Repository moved permanently to '/viewvc/lucene/solr/branches/
> > branch-1.5-dev/'; please relocate
> >
> > Going to http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.5-dev
> >  in a browser shows the web view and contents of that branch, so
> > something's not right with the subversion server.
> >
> > Anyone got any pointers please?
> >
> > Alternatively, how stable is the current trunk? Does it have a long
> > way to go before being released as a stable version?
> >
> > Many thanks
> > Mark
> 

Markus Jelsma - Technisch Architect - Buyways BV
http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17
050-8536620 / 06-50258350


Mime
View raw message