Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52083 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2010 17:24:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jul 2010 17:24:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 55092 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 17:24:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 55001 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jul 2010 17:24:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 54993 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jul 2010 17:24:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:24:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of erickerickson@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.48] (HELO mail-vw0-f48.google.com) (209.85.212.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:24:43 +0000 Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so1769179vws.35 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:24:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4HneYYjcgD2vqIZzgIpo/Ee97cu02Exys/oea2NhDZo=; b=ArKqA4S24LWR0RzZacRk0/nHx2Mxan+7hSwMquFuqopOJqLOThdkhhY3+a1kPmG71M Bf5LRfu2KYTE4kXxC9nSZiJ1eYpOoF6Wjs7WuOFKURkYjPXvPVAsoECAMhbXOFnkKSbK wKSOnCZEwk8xXKJOCvkC76Pl5++TEqlfucqUk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=n1EAyporAlkCESIyM89108Fb43eoEUejuTygpGTfQfZhrwwGj+Z4GmOB85ZJazNfzK aZHA2IfcXdbAvVoXhJJUYdakdMsfJQOThRpqcIQmMZXhigU8y2vcNfAxis9PnBVjIqIs a49YjZbp6tNudOJ9xMumd2F3/7znHlu17uTG0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.115.27 with SMTP id g27mr11186644qaq.369.1279214662340; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:24:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.233.9 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:24:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1279172604671-968581.post@n3.nabble.com> References: <1279172604671-968581.post@n3.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:24:21 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: how to eliminating scoring from a query? From: Erick Erickson To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f9b09f58a5135048b705f40 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00c09f9b09f58a5135048b705f40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable By specifying a sort that doesn't include score. I think it's just automati= c then. It wouldn't make sense to eliminate scoring *without* sorting by some other field , you'd essentially get a random ordering. Best Erick On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:43 AM, oferiko wrote: > > in http://www.lucidimagination.com/files/file/LIWP_WhatsNew_Solr1.4.pdf > http://www.lucidimagination.com/files/file/LIWP_WhatsNew_Solr1.4.pdf unde= r > the performance it mentions: > "Queries that don=92t sort by score can eliminate scoring, which speeds u= p > queries" > how exactly can i do that? If i don't mention which sort i want, it > automatically sorts by "score desc". > > thanks > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-eliminating-scoring-from-a-quer= y-tp968581p968581.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > --00c09f9b09f58a5135048b705f40--