Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 42932 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2010 19:00:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2010 19:00:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 67284 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 19:00:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 67171 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2010 19:00:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 67162 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2010 19:00:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 19:00:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of solr@elyograg.org designates 166.70.79.219 as permitted sender) Received: from [166.70.79.219] (HELO frodo.elyograg.org) (166.70.79.219) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 19:00:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frodo.elyograg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFFD23E9 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:59:28 -0600 (MDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=elyograg.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :references:subject:subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:from :date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mail; t=1278097168; bh=ksDW7e/jvWK9R2KO51rR22uxFg1C/idQZtPsTGaGczM=; b=Q2FJ19jQdXjH 445lEB74fgyN1IFx9shV16uamtyZ7sLQsIdGWXxJi7t2cv3nznRUvNPR9kcrEW18 MZXAS8NA+wb1Cq4fBbmk7pRYb6YgRKh//dNueQ+q7CNICNnUY3wOv0R2QH+ze4vD fHKooNT1HwXHlXrG5/6jO6dbZwAxcmo= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at frodo.elyograg.org Received: from frodo.elyograg.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (frodo.elyograg.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id I3zQ6Y3vs9dH for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:59:28 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.2.0.101] (client175.mainstreamdata.com [209.63.42.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: elyograg@elyograg.org) by frodo.elyograg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED8CA2F4 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:59:27 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4C2E370E.2010700@elyograg.org> Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:59:26 -0600 From: Shawn Heisey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Disk usage per-field References: <4C2BD6F6.5060109@elyograg.org> In-Reply-To: <4C2BD6F6.5060109@elyograg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 6/30/2010 5:44 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > Is it possible for Solr (or Luke/Lucene) to tell me exactly how much > of the total index disk space is used by each field? It would also be > very nice to know, for each field, how much is used by the index and > how much is used for stored data. > Still interested in this. It would be perfectly OK if such a thing were completely external to Solr and required a good chunk of time to calculate. I would not need to do it very often.