Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 38644 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 09:10:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 09:10:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 65920 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 09:10:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 65600 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 09:10:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 65591 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 09:10:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:10:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [89.161.223.23] (HELO v044473.home.net.pl) (89.161.223.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:10:22 +0000 Received: from rev-85.232.238.218.atman.pl [85.232.238.218] (HELO rkuc-laptop.bst.eo.pl) by alud.home.pl [89.161.223.23] with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer v0.70) id f4a9e6f39e096197; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:10:04 +0200 Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:09:58 +0200 From: =?windows-1250?Q?Rafa=B3_Ku=E6?= Organization: Alud Consulting X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <327033981.20100419110958@alud.com.pl> To: =?windows-1250?Q?Rafa=B3_Ku=E6?= CC: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Stemming - disable at query time - reg. In-Reply-To: <51413686.20100419105840@alud.com.pl> References: <51413686.20100419105840@alud.com.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello! MitchK posted the right solution, my post can be confusing ;( Sorry, for that. > Hello! > If you want to have both non-stemmed and stemmed field You should > use copyField. > Even if there would be a possibility to disable snowball filter at > query time, you would have stemmed tokens written in the index. >> Hi, >> I have the following filter for a field named "myText" >> >> This enables stemming, I guess. >> My questions are: >> 1) Can I disable stemming for the same field at the query time? >> 2) Do I need to copyField the "myText" to "nonStemText", wherein >> "nonStemText" is not configured with the PorterFilterFactory. >> regards, >> Naga --=20 Regards, Rafa=B3 Ku=E6