Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 3022 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 13:58:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 13:58:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 48854 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 13:58:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 48673 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2010 13:58:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 48665 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2010 13:58:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:58:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of erik.hatcher@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.221 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.221] (HELO mail-ew0-f221.google.com) (209.85.219.221) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:58:42 +0000 Received: by ewy21 with SMTP id 21so854295ewy.5 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:58:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=PK5+8fexfJBTiNsfTIhcmHdB0c7/K5XvGiHMSSgcSAQ=; b=s1iVsiX7hnxXpGCc10juyegq1s0OA3N79RbWr8RVkM1Ui+syf7FLzdaOPcIAqeWNZF 5lXow0DNDmwIriPbwphFDxCn0J5izKlulpJm2S4FKfXc7sOezOQj/k/utEWuwmeBm4KS 1JSXbvDzezO/vqWmR+w51+Ll6tvtmX3d3gWCg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=B5txjv1Og8/Mho2pnFW/7XHde79m+0KFdNy/zNUIojYQPsCe4l+bIIea1XKHEh6gbX wg9ozqcv95SCplwZ+4atomIVdwd0W5VTurFCoO9wlcQwamQnNC06aJSU0lyS+DT+Xm+9 Tr/7NdT5mpwk5Ye4k+Jdg5aGDIRQXCKHLd/XA= Received: by 10.213.40.80 with SMTP id j16mr2329820ebe.18.1271685502132; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:58:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.69] (c-71-63-2-238.hsd1.va.comcast.net [71.63.2.238]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm3763114ewy.15.2010.04.19.06.58.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:58:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <0C28B9C5-EC40-485E-81D3-38A81E3FC140@gmail.com> From: Erik Hatcher To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org In-Reply-To: <1271685227776-729646.post@n3.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: is solr ignored my filters ? Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:58:17 -0400 References: <1271685227776-729646.post@n3.nabble.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Analyzers/Tokenizers/TokenFilters operate on the text that gets indexed. Stored text remains exactly as you sent it in. Erik On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:53 AM, stockii wrote: > > hey. > > sry for this ... stupid question ;) > > when i perform an import from my data is use some filters. how can i > really > be sure that solr used my configured filters and analyzer ? > > when i search in solr the result looks 100% like bevor an import. > > thxxxx =) > -- > View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/is-solr-ignored-my-filters-tp729646p729646.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.