Return-Path: 
 <solr-user-return-29962-apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 62110 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2009 13:26:56 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2009 13:26:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 95074 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2009 13:26:53 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 94988 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2009 13:26:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:solr-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
List-Id: <solr-user.lucene.apache.org>
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 94978 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2009 13:26:53 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:26:53 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of erickerickson@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.219.225 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.219.225] (HELO mail-ew0-f225.google.com)
 (209.85.219.225)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:26:51 +0000
Received: by ewy25 with SMTP id 25so498671ewy.5
        for <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>;
 Fri, 04 Dec 2009 05:26:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=HpmvvArnauUBKhezXewNLun3e5SdLSm/1QbwkTTShlw=;
        b=DcXsK9q+479ejb4JLt3TGYavMfC3hUA92dN+7DQd9ES5SsUwYjhU83/Ddxm289ODcU
         hb6z6hrsH2JRKmp1kY1VgT8+nKUOIpwV8ne721SLkPZCdAD94+eqI5V2v+5W/enbgGvI
         xbuEh2K44CqQdARNkgHJQjEb4rHcs+KemLPLg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=IZfkCGoY4H48LP7N3WWzS4sfxg9cj7HRNRDVhcgqMgX2gh/vGfs16vmYf1nq0u3zfT
         XjN0rk1B9TptjRtUoNPyI0LXyAQ6wuKUKq+aMctunI4QaVuJ8QBzQLFNbigk4AYMF2vp
         SooLhlEMAxreaimPwdKDI+bqZnzyzKblFb98E=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.93.18 with SMTP id k18mr965509wef.218.1259933189337; Fri,
	04 Dec 2009 05:26:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <746377.89134.qm@web52906.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
References: <26635781.post@talk.nabble.com>
	 <746377.89134.qm@web52906.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 08:26:29 -0500
Message-ID: <359a92830912040526h28644378o784db35c4841df5a@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Issues with alphanumeric search terms
From: Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d9762030f3e20479e70e52

--0016e6d9762030f3e20479e70e52
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

as Ahmet says, you need to re-index.

Nothing about WordDelmiterFilterFactory alters case as far as I can tell
from
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory

Are you applying this in addition to the LowerCaseTokenizerFactory? In
which
case it's too late. The numbers have already been stripped...

Please get a copy of Luke and examine your index to see what actually
gets indexed, it'll give you a *much* better idea of what the various
analyzers actually put in your index.

Best
Erick

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 6:57 AM, AHMET ARSLAN <iorixxx@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > I have added
> >     <filter
> > class="solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory" catenateAll="1"
> > />
> > to both index and query but still getting same behaviour.
> >
> > Is there any other that i am missing?
> >
>
> Did you re-start tomcat and re-index? Why not use StandardTokenizerFactory?
>
>
>
>

--0016e6d9762030f3e20479e70e52--