lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् <noble.p...@corp.aol.com>
Subject Re: javabin in .NET?
Date Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:49:55 GMT
start with a JavabinDecoder only so that the class is simple to start with.

2009/11/16 Noble Paul നോബിള്‍  नोब्ळ् <noble.paul@corp.aol.com>:
> For a client the marshal() part is not important.unmarshal() is
> probably all you need
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Mauricio Scheffer
> <mauricioscheffer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Original code is here: http://bit.ly/hkCbI
>> I just started porting it here: http://bit.ly/37hiOs
>> It needs: tests/debugging, porting NamedList, SolrDocument, SolrDocumentList
>> Thanks for any help!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mauricio
>>
>> 2009/11/14 Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् <noble.paul@corp.aol.com>
>>
>>> OK. Is there anyone trying it out? where is this code ? I can try to help
>>> ..
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Mauricio Scheffer
>>> <mauricioscheffer@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > I meant the standard IO libraries. They are different enough that the
>>> code
>>> > has to be manually ported. There were some automated tools back when
>>> > Microsoft introduced .Net, but IIRC they never really worked.
>>> >
>>> > Anyway it's not a big deal, it should be a straightforward job. Testing
>>> it
>>> > thoroughly cross-platform is another thing though.
>>> >
>>> > 2009/11/13 Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् <noble.paul@corp.aol.com>
>>> >
>>> >> The javabin format does not have many dependencies. it may have 3-4
>>> >> classes an that is it.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Mauricio Scheffer
>>> >> <mauricioscheffer@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> > Nope. It has to be manually ported. Not so much because of the
>>> language
>>> >> > itself but because of differences in the libraries.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > 2009/11/13 Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
<noble.paul@corp.aol.com>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> Is there any tool to directly port java to .Net? then we can
etxract
>>> >> >> out the client part of the javabin code and convert it.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Erik Hatcher <
>>> erik.hatcher@gmail.com>
>>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> > Has anyone looked into using the javabin response format
from .NET
>>> >> >> (instead
>>> >> >> > of SolrJ)?
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > It's mainly a curiosity.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > How much better could performance/bandwidth/throughput
be?  How
>>> >> difficult
>>> >> >> > would it be to implement some .NET code (C#, I'd guess
being the
>>> best
>>> >> >> > choice) to handle this response format?
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Thanks,
>>> >> >> >        Erik
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> --
>>> >> >> -----------------------------------------------------
>>> >> >> Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> -----------------------------------------------------
>>> >> Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>> Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com
>



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com

Mime
View raw message