lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From wojtekpia <wojte...@hotmail.com>
Subject Solr vs Sphinx
Date Wed, 13 May 2009 15:55:55 GMT

I came across this article praising Sphinx:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/05/08/dziuba_sphinx/. The article
specifically mentions Solr as an 'aging' technology, and states that
performance on Sphinx is 2x-4x faster than Solr. Has anyone compared Sphinx
to Solr? Or used Sphinx in the past? I realize that you can't just say one
is faster than the other because it depends so much on configuration,
requirements, # docs, size of each doc, etc. I'm just looking for general
observations. I've found other articles comparing Solr with Sphinx and most
state that performance is similar between the two. 

Thanks,

Wojtek
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Solr-vs-Sphinx-tp23524676p23524676.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message