lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com>
Subject Re: Memory implications for default (score) search
Date Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:58:34 GMT
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:20 PM, outoftime <mat@patch.com> wrote:
> I've read on this list and elsewhere
> that sorting by fields has well-defined memory implications - is that true
> for relevance sorting as well?

Relevancy sorting has pretty much no memory overhead.
Note that if you use function query, that can since it typically uses
the FieldCache to obtain values per document (same as sorting).

-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com

Mime
View raw message