lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Walter Underwood <wunderw...@netflix.com>
Subject Re: Lower-cased string fieldtype?
Date Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:53:21 GMT
Thanks! I posted, went to get a sandwich, and came back to see two
answers. The change works, and I can get the fix into production today.
This list is magic.

wunder

On 3/30/09 12:13 PM, "Vauthrin, Laurent" <Laurent.Vauthrin@disney.com>
wrote:

> I'm not sure if I did this the right way but here's what I ended up
> using:
> 
> <fieldType name="string" class="solr.TextField" sortMissingLast="true"
> omitNorms="true">
> <analyzer>
> <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>
> <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
> </analyzer>
> </fieldType>
> 
> According to the comments:
> 
> <!-- KeywordTokenizer does no actual tokenizing, so the entire input
> string is preserved as a single token -->
> 
> Note: I had to use the TextField instead of StrField.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> solr-user-return-20238-Laurent.Vauthrin=disney.com@lucene.apache.org
> [mailto:solr-user-return-20238-Laurent.Vauthrin=disney.com@lucene.apache
> .org] On Behalf Of Walter Underwood
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 12:08 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Lower-cased string fieldtype?
> 
> I need a lower-cased string fieldtype (to use with the
> ElevationComponent),
> but I'm temporarily stuck. The LowerCaseFilter needs a tokenizer, but I
> don't want to tokenize. What am I missing?
> 
> wunder
> 


Mime
View raw message