lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jim Adams" <jasolru...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Partitioning the index
Date Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:47:26 GMT
that is what I thought.  Thanks.

On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinmangar@gmail.com> wrote:

> You'll need to re-index.
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Jim Adams <jasolruser@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > It's a range query.  I don't have any faceted data.
> >
> > Can I limit the precision of the existing field, or must I re-index?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Yonik Seeley <yseeley@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Jim Adams <jasolruser@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > Are there any particular suggestions on memory size for a machine?  I
> > > have a
> > > > box that has only 1 million records on it - yet I'm finding that date
> > > > searches are already unacceptable (30 seconds) slow.  Other searches
> > seem
> > > > okay though.
> > >
> > > I assume this is a date  range query (or date faceting)?
> > > Range queries with many unique terms in the range is a known
> > > limitation, and we should hopefully fix this in 1.4.
> > > In the meantime, limiting the precision of dates could help a great
> deal.
> > >
> > > -Yonik
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message