Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 96471 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2008 15:42:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Oct 2008 15:42:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 64862 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2008 15:42:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 64827 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2008 15:42:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 64816 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2008 15:42:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:42:24 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [208.69.42.181] (HELO radix.cryptio.net) (208.69.42.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:41:10 +0000 Received: by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id BD28571C598; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:41:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D4D71C592 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:41:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:41:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Hostetter To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solr 1.3 Maven Artifact Problem In-Reply-To: <49008AE7.4070106@deri.org> Message-ID: References: <49008AE7.4070106@deri.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org : 1) solr-core artifact contains org.apache.solr.client.solrj packages, and at : the same time, the solr-core artifact depends on the solr-solrj artifact. what you are seeing isn't specific to the maven jars, that's the way it is in hte standard release. i believe the inclusion of solrj code in the core jar is intentional, the core jar is intended (as i understand it) to encapsulate everything needed to run "Solr" (and because of the built in distributed search features, solr needs to be a solr client) I'm not sure if there's any reason for solr-core to declare a maven dependency on solr-solrj. -Hoss