Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of twoencore@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.200.172 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=ZBv7NVdla8BTuUs3iLxaAlANVXNOunktjkwLqgf0p39MBBQ33HBJmKmd2U7sukYc32uMf82WMHENBDO0Xre0L9T8cAsUPh7ci4w4GF6RmP1X1YHfMRCsXP6YRt3/AT6twzLzWQr8811QOw/WrFQFGENJ1yuIA7PKGln7se8/fhY=
Message-ID: <cda17e050803261445h31099577m9b3de25f7afd37a1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:45:47 -0400
From: "Jeryl Cook" <twoencore@gmail.com>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org, orion@terracottatech.com
Subject: Re: Update schema.xml without restarting Solr?
In-Reply-To: <c68e39170803261416v8271794j2a40ecf45f998428@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <602657.67340.qm@web50311.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
	 <47EAB4EB.2090007@gmail.com>
	 <c68e39170803261416v8271794j2a40ecf45f998428@mail.gmail.com>

i wouldn't call Terracotta approach magic(smile)..., it's being used
quite a bit in many scalable high performing projects...

i personally used Terracotta and Lucene, and it worked but did not try
to "cluster" it with multiple terracotta(workers) across nodes , and
the Terracotta(master)..just a single box with two tomcat instances...

However "talk is cheap", if I have the time over the next few weeks
ill make a bench mark test based on the "Terracotta and Lucene", with
maybe 3 nodes?and a 1 million documents..
maybe some others can do the same :)..

FYI: http://www.terracotta.org/confluence/display/tcforge/Proposal+-+Terracotta+for+Lucene

Jeryl Cook

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Yonik Seeley <yonik@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Ryan McKinley <ryantxu@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > just intuition - haven't tried it, so i'd love to be proved wrong.
>  >  Instrumenting Objects and magically passing them around seems like it
>  >  would be slower then a tuned approach used in SOLR-303.
>
>  Yep, that's my sense too.  No magic solutions when it comes to scalability.
>
>  -Yonik
>


-- 
Jeryl Cook
/^\ Pharaoh /^\
http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/
"..Act your age, and not your shoe size.." -Prince(1986)