lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeryl Cook" <twoenc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Update schema.xml without restarting Solr?
Date Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:45:47 GMT
i wouldn't call Terracotta approach magic(smile)..., it's being used
quite a bit in many scalable high performing projects...

i personally used Terracotta and Lucene, and it worked but did not try
to "cluster" it with multiple terracotta(workers) across nodes , and
the Terracotta(master)..just a single box with two tomcat instances...

However "talk is cheap", if I have the time over the next few weeks
ill make a bench mark test based on the "Terracotta and Lucene", with
maybe 3 nodes?and a 1 million documents..
maybe some others can do the same :)..

FYI: http://www.terracotta.org/confluence/display/tcforge/Proposal+-+Terracotta+for+Lucene

Jeryl Cook

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Yonik Seeley <yonik@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Ryan McKinley <ryantxu@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > just intuition - haven't tried it, so i'd love to be proved wrong.
>  >  Instrumenting Objects and magically passing them around seems like it
>  >  would be slower then a tuned approach used in SOLR-303.
>
>  Yep, that's my sense too.  No magic solutions when it comes to scalability.
>
>  -Yonik
>



-- 
Jeryl Cook
/^\ Pharaoh /^\
http://pharaohofkush.blogspot.com/
"..Act your age, and not your shoe size.." -Prince(1986)

Mime
View raw message