Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: RE: question about bi-gram analysis on query
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 00:46:38 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <7EA6A25EC6360A488E0EBB5F3F21A0DC19622028@mail-sd4.ad.soe.sony.com>
In-Reply-To: <23187.23681.qm@web50308.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Thread-Topic: question about bi-gram analysis on query
Thread-Index: AcgH5XKJp4WB7Mu1QQ+zf8Jtn0a1uwABs7ow
References: <23187.23681.qm@web50308.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
From: "Keene, David" <dkeene@soe.sony.com>
To: <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>

Hi Otis!

Yes, I've run the query though debugQuery=yes.  I posted the difference between the debug output and the Luke parsed query in my original post.  here's a snippet:

>>>>>>>>
Also, I've noticed that the parsed query on luke is:
text:"美聯 聯社"
and in solr it is:
text:"美聯 聯社 "
I noticed there is an extra space in the solr parsed query.  I don't know if that makes a difference.
>>>>>>>>>

Like I said, the space in there is the only difference between my parsed query in Luke and the debug query output .  I even stepped though the response in solr with eclipse, and confirmed that the parsed query was tokenenized properly (bigram), but had that extra space in there.

On the analysis page, I see hits come up in the text fine, but nothing on a search from the main page.

Thanks,
Dave


-----Original Message-----
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodnetic@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 11:51 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about bi-gram analysis on query

Dave,

Have you tried using ....&debugQuery=true ? :)

Otis
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/  -  Tag  -  Search  -  Share

----- Original Message ----
From: "Keene, David" <dkeene@soe.sony.com>
To: Teruhiko Kurosaka <Kuro@basistech.com>
Cc: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 4, 2007 4:44:59 PM
Subject: RE: question about bi-gram analysis on query

Hi,

Thanks for responding.  I should have been clearer..

By "actual search" I meant hitting the search demo page on the solr admin page.  So I get no results on this query:

/solr/select/?q=%E7%BE%8E%E8%81%AF&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on

But the same query (with the data in my index) on the analysis page shows me a hit (and the same search in Luke gets me a hit too).

I've tried this on 1.1, 1.2 and nightly as of yesterday. I assume that I am missing something really obvious..

-Dave


-----Original Message-----
From: Teruhiko Kurosaka [mailto:Kuro@basistech.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 12:44 PM
To: Keene, David
Cc: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: question about bi-gram analysis on query

Hello David,
> And if I do a search in Luke and the solr analysis page 
> for美聯, I get a hit.  But on the actual search, I don't.

I think you need to tell us what you mean by "actual search"
and your code that interfaces with Solr.

-kuro