Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 72400 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2007 00:39:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 2007 00:39:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 91516 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2007 00:39:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 91492 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2007 00:39:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 91483 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2007 00:39:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:39:28 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of goksron@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.187 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.187] (HELO rv-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.198.187) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 00:39:30 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so969611rvb for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:39:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:x-mimeole:thread-index; bh=6HX/Fw6ANwyxoCve/l+FL1kvENgqliQgHjf8cF7VE4g=; b=qJKPW2mWDYPYoE2bN56aMo44StORbcPqTCJ9+BhvKA7By0WGgA3QjYZHUyCDiHNB2HXK7JyLb8WCeGTqh1r1CtUdyE0/2ntqqQU2gn2hLY42AWKbKa4HUSxXuoRCAg6a2jA16tW8U26bQryO0Y7bdrZKurVRvGlG/XZMMD5Qhe4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:x-mimeole:thread-index; b=aJTkr2FMGchIVQMLIlsucSjmZnYsOmpUo/+7QYQ0SOQ9jzZPsTS1AexRftVqYMBPu3liKsRVqszT/w0yJ9HxJXoS6+gqpPd0RBFBVO0eizHMcLejak1ARD+5JWaovydM/cdqbAK75YPQP3nigtqtDWFvkuUfdwyI4f/234F6QQQ= Received: by 10.141.202.12 with SMTP id e12mr2149819rvq.1192322349307; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:39:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from madrid ( [75.144.19.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f13sm3826192rvb.2007.10.13.17.39.02 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:39:07 -0700 (PDT) From: "Lance Norskog" To: Subject: Non-sortable types in sample schema Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 17:37:06 -0700 Message-ID: <041301c80dfa$5c751060$770fa8c0@madrid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0414_01C80DBF.B0163860" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 Thread-Index: AcgN+liqTrHsA+fwS/m0xgDBf72SBQ== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_NextPart_000_0414_01C80DBF.B0163860 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The sample schema in Solr 1.2 supplies two variants of integers, longs, floats, doubles. One variant is sortable and one is not. What is the point of having both? Why would I choose the non-sorting variants? Do they store fewer bytes per record? Thanks, Lance Norskog ------=_NextPart_000_0414_01C80DBF.B0163860--