Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 25698 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2007 22:26:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Mar 2007 22:26:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 26239 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2007 22:26:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 26221 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2007 22:26:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 26212 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2007 22:26:11 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:26:11 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [68.142.199.96] (HELO web81104.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.199.96) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:26:03 -0700 Received: (qmail 67433 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Mar 2007 22:25:42 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=3/dKS2ZfHmKcSWrpXaTVw5Owcylk3f0EizCPFfFGXuKwcRUPg/LN3TZopnUqgmRWToIHPddTjokjxK29wN2bEqvjnmT+lBpTRxchqTuFBVotJ7GKLWZKOU+PCT5NJDqRmR7B+LaakV3HPIW+/j0ohWcj7j2zn5A2tanefUN7vr0=; X-YMail-OSG: 4D6XB8EVM1lVXOKr1spCzXTXRxcJci8Hfh0VDfU_ZeibXUf7MLDQdFhYKj1IC5BIBwow9fox3OnuP6VaAGBGzyzbacxqSh2Iu1WW Received: from [63.65.153.94] by web81104.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:25:42 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/468 YahooMailWebService/0.7.41.8 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:25:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Osborn Subject: Re: maximum index size To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1263135836-1175034342=:67039" Message-ID: <506079.67039.qm@web81104.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1263135836-1175034342=:67039 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii ----- Original Message ---- From: Mike Klaas To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 3:20:40 PM Subject: Re: maximum index size If you are going to store a document for each customer then some field must indicate to which customer the document instance belongs. In that case, why not index a single copy of each document, with a field containing a list of customers having access? Unfortunately, each customer will also potentially customize the way they do their searches. If it was just an ACL, that is probably what I would do. --0-1263135836-1175034342=:67039--