lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mike Klaas" <mike.kl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Faceted search glitch???
Date Sat, 10 Feb 2007 23:56:43 GMT
On 2/10/07, Chris Hostetter <hossman_lucene@fucit.org> wrote:

> : As for future expansion, some possibilities are: filter.op/filter.q.op
> : (set operator of filter query parser, which is currently OR regardless
>
> I'm not sure why/how thta would ever make sense... you'd be much better
> off using seperate filters so they can cache independently - not to
> mention the reason q.op was added was for dealing with user entered query
> strings, but are filter queries ever entered manually by a user?

See below.

> : of the solrconfig setting),  filter.range, and filter.q.noncached
> : (something I would definitely use if it existed).
>
> filter range could just be done with a filter.query/fq right?  a

It sure could, but I was just trying to stretch my imagination as far
as possible.  filter.term also seems to me like only a marginal
improvement over lucene syntax.

-Mike

Mime
View raw message