Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of mike.klaas@gmail.com designates
 66.249.92.174 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Zg3HBpEyzo9hMlgysoqVjvqupiFTqYuNTkD+fnjc2d8zgmOZfrtQbvuwBaPxWDA2NSMNone4XxjZ0jkXzvJaZhRQ9EbhXOtjtUTcEP09ji33LQankYuRpt3Qy6MEn98RDq6z1vzdrD+McqWmgF4PBw/t9Vfn6SZTIIxIUG5OITQ=
Message-ID: <3d2ce8cb0608111431g618600afx76ac63a0b027fe1f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:31:28 -0700
From: "Mike Klaas" <mike.klaas@gmail.com>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Highlighting problem - mutivalue field
In-Reply-To: <44DCF029.5050409@ingenta.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <44DCF029.5050409@ingenta.com>

On 8/11/06, Andrew May <amay@ingenta.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm afraid I've found another slightly odd thing with Highlighting, in this case in a
> multi-valued field I'm using for author names.

Thanks for the report.  This is a known Lucene Highlighter issue; see
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-645.

The issue contains a patch which you may want to apply to your local
code, though there are some cases which could cause relatively severe
problems (namely, very with large fields, which you may not care
about).

regards,
-MIke