lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mike Klaas" <mike.kl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: acts_as_solr
Date Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:25:34 GMT
On 8/29/06, Chris Hostetter <hossman_lucene@fucit.org> wrote:

> Maybe ... "contrib" in the "Java Lucene" project sense however is all java
> code, i would imagine that if someone wrote a perl utility to deal with
> index files it would not make sense to but in the Lucene "contrib"
> directory for that reason ... thre may be Java code submitted down the
> road that we think is useful enough to make available in releases, but
> niche enough that we on't want to put it in the main solr.war, which might
> be more along the lines of the "contrib" notion -- hence my suggestion of
> "clients" ...
>
> ...but i'm just thinking outloud at this point, i don't have a strong
> opinion either way.

Your point definately resonates.  clients are also a rather important
type of third-party contribution for a webapp thus a top-level
directory makes sense.

-Mike

Mime
View raw message