Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 32830 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2006 17:56:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2006 17:56:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 5212 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2006 17:56:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 5193 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2006 17:56:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 5184 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2006 17:56:09 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:56:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of joetomgo@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.200 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.200] (HELO wx-out-0102.google.com) (66.249.82.200) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:56:08 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id s16so234757wxc for ; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:55:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=kZsxuZ994RCUS516qHWAWrWddJLsXxagPtDv+P/NiCopMrLCQ7Xin4WZ1jT/ir5M7xMGJa51sZq8aNOw59YTOdtOiEZr13WxgLxYAF5OryApKCtAewdHDolIc6oleUfC3TmLRpwEIlqwicSHPPCCfWomwi3kHQjMUXHcqywv6Ro= Received: by 10.70.34.20 with SMTP id h20mr1069292wxh; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:55:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.91.1 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 10:55:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 13:55:45 -0400 From: "Tim Archambault" Sender: joetomgo@gmail.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: solr newbie In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3835_25106237.1149184545906" References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: f5e1f1ecc6d1be0d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_3835_25106237.1149184545906 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Great thanks. I manage a newspaper website in Maine USA with about 400,000-500,000 documents/database records (if not more) and I am going to try and create a solr search engine for the site. We'll see how it goes. I've been using a "bastardized" lucene search for my site up to now, but this looks much better. On 6/1/06, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > On 6/1/06, Tim Archambault wrote: > > I found the "web" options. Thank you very much. While that is installing > > incrementally, two last questions. > > > > Are there any example stylesheets to review to see how the data flows > into > > the layout? > > How would one go about injecting database information into the indexs > > without having to create XML files for each one? > > It's most efficient to make a "builder" application that reads from > the database, constructs XML documents *in memory* and sends them to > the Solr server. Multiple threads/connections open to the Solr server > will speed up indexing and hide any request-response latency of > individual adds. > > We don't have it yet, but there really should be a simple Java client > library that creates the XML add commands and handles sending them to > the server. > > Also on the "todo" list is indexing directly from a SQL database w/o > the user having to write any code except select statements. > > -Yonik > ------=_Part_3835_25106237.1149184545906--