lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lukáš Vlček <lukas.vl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: rough outline of where Solr's going
Date Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:06:54 GMT
Hmmm... may be I am completely wrong but let's take JBoss. It ships products
based on community driven projects but I am not aware of the fact that they
would try to affect community wrt to numbering or repositories merges. It is
up to JBoss developers and testers to deal with this "complexity" and
deliver commercial product and explain customers what is in.

Just my 2 cents (probably not related to this discussion at all - I hope).
Lukas

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Mark Miller <markrmiller@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 03/18/2010 02:49 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
>> Use 3.1 and developers in the know will understand that i's because we're
>> using LuceneJava 3.1; but uninformed users *might* be confused as to why
>> it jumped to a (seemingly) arbitrary number.
>>
>>
>
> Sorry about the following non serious reply:
>
> It hasn't seemed to hurt the most popular software in the world to be way
> worse than that ;)
>
> 1, 2, 3, NT, 95, 98, 98SE, ME, CE, 2000, XP, 2003, Vista, 2008, 7 (by who's
> count in what manner?).
>
> --
> - Mark
>
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message