lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grant Ingersoll <>
Subject Re: rough outline of where Solr's going
Date Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:50:53 GMT

On Mar 17, 2010, at 9:41 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Grant Ingersoll <> wrote:
>> I tend to agree w/ Hoss here.  I don't think we have to be the same version numbers
and I don't think we absolutely have to do lockstep releases.
> No one said "absolutely".
> It's important to try and release at the same time.  Without that, it
> makes a lot less sense for Solr to be on Lucene's trunk.  

I don't think releasing separately means Solr can't be on Lucene's trunk.  The two issues
are orthogonal.

> Many of us
> believe this is important to try to do... so I guess we'll try to do
> that, even if everyone isn't on board.

I agree, it's important to try, but it isn't a show stopper, which is what the word lockstep
View raw message