Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 57558 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2010 18:48:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2010 18:48:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 58398 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2010 18:48:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 58308 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2010 18:48:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 58298 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2010 18:48:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:48:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of noble.paul@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.185] (HELO mail-px0-f185.google.com) (209.85.216.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 18:48:51 +0000 Received: by pxi15 with SMTP id 15so531352pxi.21 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:48:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=jlyXCdF4wAJZZkMzvAwJD5axcL7qMRvj7zV3nQiiAB8=; b=G7igLiv34/Ms11Xl3TYh0TmAvBH0FLWzAGMZUuxK1JGbdTihate56WhFdLKqFP/o47 wQn/UJYcrB1RIs6sgp86hlQnixrsCGFq5YaoTDs4btmYAxqAzXqklFIIB8sUo4nzlWip 8i6IRwyh9ZXQXHPEmu09fIQVhKFibYAFWpcFo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=YcX6bkOS5rfHsSrX49dnk8J5Mo58KzGuEKhOSqBWvvM7MQ/uFoYe2yaz0VhDCLQNQq ctMNcUEmir9uxk89Slixr5nptVJQh3CoJwAFeAnsL6T7pu5y9/ur2TO0yLDO/ta0ViKq hcmMCrIjZQMReAXPv+MT8ob9hkQskvBiEluK4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: noble.paul@gmail.com Reply-To: noble.paul@gmail.com Received: by 10.141.105.20 with SMTP id h20mr8084944rvm.154.1266691711123; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:48:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <85d3c3b61002191346i7026db30i3f4c5d29f104f501@mail.gmail.com> References: <85d3c3b61002191346i7026db30i3f4c5d29f104f501@mail.gmail.com> From: =?UTF-8?B?Tm9ibGUgUGF1bCDgtKjgtYvgtKzgtL/gtLPgtY3igI0gIOCkqOCli+CkrOCljeCks+CljQ==?= Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 00:18:11 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: a942d02d0d674790 Message-ID: <5e76b0ad1002201048r284f9a9dy79b3a82b7d57b6d5@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Can we move FileFetcher out of SnapPuller? To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Jason Rutherglen wrote: > Can we move FileFetcher out of SnapPuller? This will assist with > reusing the replication handler for moving/copying cores. NO problem .raise an issue.. > -- ----------------------------------------------------- Noble Paul | Systems Architect| AOL | http://aol.com