Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 53426 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2010 18:39:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2010 18:39:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 15863 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2010 18:39:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 15784 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2010 18:39:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 15774 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2010 18:39:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:39:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yseeley@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.210 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.210] (HELO mail-fx0-f210.google.com) (209.85.220.210) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:38:59 +0000 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so22594396fxm.5 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:38:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=lfJDMIe/UJapTVPT+U7pz1eOUQuu8ZtkRNjBWWQCM78=; b=EOzBmnpyXjdRQB+9sCUZ08tDR11Ev0u69jOsFaKa8KH/vlQC20Eut7BeyXRsx518mb bi8DT7jXmCGGNzWwCagw0cSgSCU6VNcYvWDmMHKRPRITTSs5cCz1mV7jBNocDjI6p7lD xYX22bFr5Z5vE2jSQ+P8D6IWuNQ8HjuJJHbEY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=SswOnC1SghZTBhy+L3oQu2e7gI6mpGvusWiZOtjvk9rA35442qa7OZ2kah1bgPgWlk lt/pcLUcKQLzGCRSJLRbBmjITtXugn9La0YopjC84IDk8jLP/HNzCzOWF1yIBYNVM5jW wWx2eMPl3Q2drUSJuMoOzMObL83rrYii74RQk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yseeley@gmail.com Reply-To: yonik@lucidimagination.com Received: by 10.216.89.12 with SMTP id b12mr435344wef.93.1263494319394; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:38:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:38:39 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3ad4adea97704eb1 Message-ID: Subject: Re: SolrCloud logical shards From: Yonik Seeley To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > I'm actually starting to lean toward "slice" instead of "logical shard". I've gone with this for now and updated http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud but it's certainly not written in stone if people want to try and come up with better naming... -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com