Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 22815 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2010 01:36:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2010 01:36:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 56891 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 01:36:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 56828 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 01:36:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 56818 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2010 01:36:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:36:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:36:15 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC794234C495 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:35:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1649611813.200341263346554967.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:35:54 +0000 (UTC) From: "Brian Westphal (JIRA)" To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-773) Incorporate Local Lucene/Solr In-Reply-To: <1089092633.1221505424636.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12799515#action_12799515 ] Brian Westphal commented on SOLR-773: ------------------------------------- We've got Localsolr (2.9.1 lucene-spatial library) running on Solr 1.4 with Tomcat 1.6. Everything's looking good, except for a couple little issues. Issue #1: If we specify fl=id (or fl= anything) and wt=json it seems that the fl parameter is ignored (thus we get a lot more detail in our results than we'd like). If we specify fl=id and leave out wt=json (which defaults to returning xml results), we get the expected fields back. We'd really prefer to use wt=json because the results are easier for us to deal with (also, the same issue also arises with wt=python and wt=ruby). Issue #2: It looks like the defType parameter isn't properly passed through for geo queries, making it really hard to use things like dismax + geo. I've been playing with the code a bit and have a "working" patch for it. However, as I'm very new to the solr/localsolr source, I'd be uncomfortable submitting it without additional testing. --------- If anyone knows any workarounds for these issues, please let me know. > Incorporate Local Lucene/Solr > ----------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-773 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-773 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Grant Ingersoll > Assignee: Grant Ingersoll > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.5 > > Attachments: exampleSpatial.zip, lucene-spatial-2.9-dev.jar, lucene.tar.gz, screenshot-1.jpg, SOLR-773-local-lucene.patch, SOLR-773-local-lucene.patch, SOLR-773-local-lucene.patch, SOLR-773-local-lucene.patch, SOLR-773-local-lucene.patch, SOLR-773-spatial_solr.patch, SOLR-773.patch, SOLR-773.patch, solrGeoQuery.tar, spatial-solr.tar.gz > > > Local Lucene has been donated to the Lucene project. It has some Solr components, but we should evaluate how best to incorporate it into Solr. > See http://lucene.markmail.org/message/orzro22sqdj3wows?q=LocalLucene -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.