Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 16951 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2010 21:52:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2010 21:52:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 7224 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2010 21:52:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 7150 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2010 21:52:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 7102 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2010 21:52:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:52:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 21:52:14 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F77234C045 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 13:51:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1297494727.54181262728314527.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 21:51:54 +0000 (UTC) From: "Robert Muir (JIRA)" To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-1677) Add support for o.a.lucene.util.Version for BaseTokenizerFactory and BaseTokenFilterFactory In-Reply-To: <349452053.1261337658468.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796862#action_12796862 ] Robert Muir commented on SOLR-1677: ----------------------------------- bq. Oh come on now ... that's not really a fair criticism of the example: there are plenty of legitimate ways to use (some) TokenFilters only at search time and I specifically structured my example to point out potential problems in cases just like that - Carl was very clear that "if you used FooTokenFilterFactory in an index analyzer you'll need to reindex." I disagree, Version applies to all of lucene (even more than tokenstreams), so for Carl to imply that you don't need to reindex by bumping Version simply because you aren't using X or Y or Z, for that he should be renamed Oscar. bq. You could now argue that User Dwight is an idiot because he didn't warn Bob that other Analyzers/Tokenizers/TokenFilters might be affected. But that just leads us to scenerious that re-iterates my point that this type of global value is something that would be dangerous to ever change.... Yeah, I guess I don't think he is an idiot. I just think he is a moron for suggesting such a thing without warning of the consequences. bq. Personally I never change the value of once i have an existing schema.xml file. Instead i suggest you add luceneVersion="3.2" to your