lucene-solr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chris Male (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (SOLR-1699) deprecate the updateHandler configuration syntax
Date Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:04:54 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796586#action_12796586
] 

Chris Male commented on SOLR-1699:
----------------------------------

Hi,

I like the idea of standardising the syntax in the solrconfig.xml, but I think this is actually
not categorising the UpdateHandler correctly.  It gives the impression that it can respond
to requests, and is just an alternative to the other update request handlers (XmlUpdateRequestHandlers
& co), which it isn't.

> deprecate the updateHandler configuration syntax
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1699
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1699
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Noble Paul
>             Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> For all practical purposes, an updatehandler is a requestHandler. We can do away with
a custom syntax for updatehandler
> example
> {code:xml}
> <requestHandler class="solr.DirectUpdateHandler2">
>     
>     <lst name="autoCommit"> 
>       <int name="maxDocs">10000</int>
>       <int name="maxTime">3600000</int> 
>     </lst>
>     
>     <!-- represents a lower bound on the frequency that commits may
>     occur (in seconds). NOTE: not yet implemented
>     
>     <int name="commitIntervalLowerBound">0</int>
>     -->
>   </requestHandler>
> {code}

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message