Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52719 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2009 14:09:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Dec 2009 14:09:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 708 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2009 14:08:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 651 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2009 14:08:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 638 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2009 14:08:57 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:08:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:08:49 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E01234C04C for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:08:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <665635222.1261490909608.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:08:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-236) Field collapsing In-Reply-To: <19014374.1178921656142.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=3Dcom.atlassian.j= ira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D127936= 21#action_12793621 ]=20 Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-236: ----------------------------------- bq. As far as I understand from your collapse algorithm proposal, in order = to save memory you'd like to restrict the group creation to only those that= belong in the requested results page. A ton of memory, and probably a good amount of time too. It may be the onl= y variant that certain people would be able to use (but note that it is jus= t a variant - I'm not proposing doing away with the other options). bq. I think there might be a problem with pagination as well Yes, pagination is a sticky issue... but I don't think this algorithm messe= s it up further. If we are returning a number of documents (as opposed to a number of groups= ) to the user, how do they avoid splitting on a page in the middle of the g= roup? I guess they over-request a little. What if they want a fixed numbe= r of groups? I guess they over-request by a lot (nGroups*collapse.threshol= d). Then they need to keep track of how many documents they actually used. The only thing this algorithm can't do (related to pagination) is give the = total number of documents after collapsing (and hence can't calculate the e= xact number of pages). This can be fine in many circumstances as long as t= he gui handles it (people don't seem to mind google doing it... I just trie= d it. Google didn't show the result count right unless displaying the last= page). > Field collapsing > ---------------- > > Key: SOLR-236 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: search > Affects Versions: 1.3 > Reporter: Emmanuel Keller > Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar > Fix For: 1.5 > > Attachments: collapsing-patch-to-1.3.0-dieter.patch, collapsing-p= atch-to-1.3.0-ivan.patch, collapsing-patch-to-1.3.0-ivan_2.patch, collapsin= g-patch-to-1.3.0-ivan_3.patch, field-collapse-3.patch, field-collapse-4-wit= h-solrj.patch, field-collapse-5.patch, field-collapse-5.patch, field-collap= se-5.patch, field-collapse-5.patch, field-collapse-5.patch, field-collapse-= 5.patch, field-collapse-5.patch, field-collapse-5.patch, field-collapse-5.p= atch, field-collapse-5.patch, field-collapse-5.patch, field-collapse-5.patc= h, field-collapse-5.patch, field-collapse-5.patch, field-collapse-5.patch, = field-collapse-solr-236-2.patch, field-collapse-solr-236.patch, field-colla= psing-extended-592129.patch, field_collapsing_1.1.0.patch, field_collapsing= _1.3.patch, field_collapsing_dsteigerwald.diff, field_collapsing_dsteigerwa= ld.diff, field_collapsing_dsteigerwald.diff, quasidistributed.additional.pa= tch, SOLR-236-FieldCollapsing.patch, SOLR-236-FieldCollapsing.patch, SOLR-2= 36-FieldCollapsing.patch, SOLR-236.patch, SOLR-236.patch, SOLR-236.patch, s= olr-236.patch, SOLR-236_collapsing.patch, SOLR-236_collapsing.patch > > > This patch include a new feature called "Field collapsing". > "Used in order to collapse a group of results with similar value for a gi= ven field to a single entry in the result set. Site collapsing is a special= case of this, where all results for a given web site is collapsed into one= or two entries in the result set, typically with an associated "more docum= ents from this site" link. See also Duplicate detection." > http://www.fastsearch.com/glossary.aspx?m=3D48&amid=3D299 > The implementation add 3 new query parameters (SolrParams): > "collapse.field" to choose the field used to group results > "collapse.type" normal (default value) or adjacent > "collapse.max" to select how many continuous results are allowed before c= ollapsing > TODO (in progress): > - More documentation (on source code) > - Test cases > Two patches: > - "field_collapsing.patch" for current development version > - "field_collapsing_1.1.0.patch" for Solr-1.1.0 > P.S.: Feedback and misspelling correction are welcome ;-) --=20 This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.