Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 55653 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2009 04:14:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Dec 2009 04:14:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 52686 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2009 04:14:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-dev-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 52429 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2009 04:14:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-dev-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 52415 invoked by uid 99); 12 Dec 2009 04:14:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:14:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:14:38 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3225E234C1E9 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:14:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1668721899.1260591258203.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:14:18 +0000 (UTC) From: "Noble Paul (JIRA)" To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-1621) Allow current single core deployments to be specified by solr.xml In-Reply-To: <2063388127.1259900720764.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789675#action_12789675 ] Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1621: ---------------------------------- bq.You mark setSolrConfigFilename as deprecated, but it simply doesn't work anymore either - thats not really deprecation. I feel that deprecating solrconfig-filename should be its own issue so thats a more clear entry in CHANGES I shall open another issue for this. The setSolrConfigFilename() did not work for multicore . So it does not make sense for us to bend over backwards to make it work in this and add too many overloaded methods. Anyway, users won't need > Allow current single core deployments to be specified by solr.xml > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-1621 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1621 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 1.5 > Reporter: Noble Paul > Fix For: 1.5 > > Attachments: SOLR-1621.patch, SOLR-1621.patch, SOLR-1621.patch, SOLR-1621.patch, SOLR-1621.patch, SOLR-1621.patch, SOLR-1621.patch, SOLR-1621.patch, SOLR-1621.patch > > > supporting two different modes of deployments is turning out to be hard. This leads to duplication of code. Moreover there is a lot of confusion on where do we put common configuration. See the mail thread http://markmail.org/message/3m3rqvp2ckausjnf -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.